Structural change in OECD comparative advantage
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Economic Geography, Comparative Advantage and Trade Within Industries: Evidence from the OECD*
A large share of world trade, especially among the OECD countries, is two-way trade within industries, so called intra-industry trade. Despite this, few attempts have been made to examine why countries export some products within industries, whereas they import others. We examine this issue, by means of regression analysis, by examining the shares of IIT that are vertical and horizontal and by ...
متن کاملComparative Advantage and Competitive Advantage:
There is a considerable amount of controversy about the model(s) of comparative advantage and its applicability to international business, in particular as a guide to the success of nations and/or firms in international markets. This perception (or understanding) of inapplicability of the model(s) of comparative advantage has lead international business experts to develop new models, or what ma...
متن کاملStructural change, aggregate demand and employment dynamics in the OECD, 1970¬タモ2010
The paper combines Baumol’s model of structural change with a model of aggregate demand growth in the Keynesian–Kaleckian tradition to predict the dynamics of aggregate employment. The model for the demand regime is estimated with – and Baumol’s model for the productivity regime is calibrated on – OECD data. The trajectory for employment predicted by the combination of the two models tracks the...
متن کاملComparative Advantage in Social Interactions∗
We propose a model of social interactions based on comparative advantage. When comparative advantage is the guiding principle of social interactions, the effect of moving a student into an environment with higher-achieving peers depends on where in the ability distribution she falls and the shadow prices that clear the social market. We show that the model’s key prediction–an individual’s ordin...
متن کاملThediscoveryof Comparative Advantage
Thus Jacob Viner (1937, p. 442) balanced the claims of E. R. A. Seligman for Robert Torrens against those of J. H. Hollander for David Ricardo. Lionel Robbins (1958) found rather more in Torrens, and J. Chipman (1965) also made much of his contribution. W. O. Thweatt (1976) made a small sensation when he attributed Ricardo’s formulation to James Mill, regarded only as a popularizer of Ricardo’s...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development
سال: 2013
ISSN: 0963-8199,1469-9559
DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2011.605460